Showing posts with label book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book. Show all posts
New Comic Book Releases List
ComicList was founded Jan. 12, 1995 with the mission of empowering comic book consumers by providing accurate and timely information. By delivering the weekly list of new releases, along with news concerning current and future products available in local and online comic book shops, we enable consumers to meet their goals more effectively.
Comic Book Action Movies
Here is criteria to grading comic book movies:
Good-Worth seeing again.
Tedious-Worth seeing, but not for repeated viewings
Bad-Not worth seeing at all.
Of course some people may tell me that "tedious" is close to being the same thing as "bad." The tedious movies had good acting and good special effects, but they either repeated scenes over and over or they strectched their movie out way too long.
X-Men (tedious)
X2 (tedious)
Hulk (tedious)
Elektra (bad)
Batman (bad)
Batman Returns (bad)
Batman Forever (good)
Batman & Robin (bad)
Spider-Man 2 (good)
Punisher (good)
Hellboy (good)
Sin City (good)
Blade II (good)
League of Extordinary Gentlemen (bad)
Spider-Man (tedious)
Superman II (good)
Superman III (bad)
Sin City (good)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles I, II, and III (bad)
Comic Book Movies I have never seen and why:
Blade (DVD I rented was scratched and messed up. I'll rent it soon)
Blade Trinty (I'll get around to it)
Superman IV (Never finished it and I have no desire to)
Catwoman (I'm making it a point to never see this)
Punisher (1990 version) (Ditto)
Captain America (Double Ditto)
Spawn (Triple Ditto)
Supergirl (Quadruple Ditto)
Howard the Duck (Penta Ditto?) CRITERIA to grading comic book for Richard
Good-Worth seeing again.
Tedious-Worth seeing, but not for repeated viewings
Bad-Not worth seeing at all.
Of course some people may tell me that "tedious" is close to being the same thing as "bad." The tedious movies had good acting and good special effects, but they either repeated scenes over and over or they strectched their movie out way too long.
X-Men (tedious)
X2 (tedious)
Hulk (tedious)
Elektra (bad)
Batman (bad)
Batman Returns (bad)
Batman Forever (good)
Batman & Robin (bad)
Spider-Man 2 (good)
Punisher (good)
Hellboy (good)
Sin City (good)
Blade II (good)
League of Extordinary Gentlemen (bad)
Spider-Man (tedious)
Superman II (good)
Superman III (bad)
Sin City (good)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles I, II, and III (bad)
Comic Book Movies I have never seen and why:
Blade (DVD I rented was scratched and messed up. I'll rent it soon)
Blade Trinty (I'll get around to it)
Superman IV (Never finished it and I have no desire to)
Catwoman (I'm making it a point to never see this)
Punisher (1990 version) (Ditto)
Captain America (Double Ditto)
Spawn (Triple Ditto)
Supergirl (Quadruple Ditto)
Howard the Duck (Penta Ditto?) CRITERIA to grading comic book for Richard
Review: Superheroes and Philosophy. Tom Morris and Matt Morris
Superheroes and Philosophy
Edited by Tom Morris and Matt Morris
2005
Non-fiction Book
Open Court
Part of the "Popular Culture and Philosophy" series of books (other titles include Buffy, Seinfeld, Simpsons, Lord of the Rings, and so on), this book should be either informative on super hero / comic book culture or even academically charged to provide new intellectual insight into these characters and universes. Sadly the book does neither.
Instead this anthology of essays provides poorly written (for the most part), terribly thought out (on all counts), contrived and useless essays by supposedly well educated people. I reviewed and revised that sentence numerous times and truly could not come up with a less offensive way to say it. This book should have been sharp, interesting, fun, and educational. Enough about what it should have been, let's review what it is.
The book is an attempt to relate super heroes and their worlds to philosophical theories in a very sociological manner. The book is broken into four parts: The Image of the Superhero, The Existential World of the Superhero, Superheroes and Moral Duty, and Identity and Superhero Metaphysics. Each section has between 3 and 6 essays on different characters across the major publishers (and only the major two, Marvel and DC) and how they relate to some larger philosophical issue. The authors are primarily PhD recipients or candidates in academia, though there are a handful of comic book writers and such included as well (and these tend to be the best).
The first section, the Image of the Superhero, reviews Superman and his very human social qualities, the idea of a superhero, memes and the Crimson Viper, and superhero revisionism. From the start, three of these four essays sounded like "woah" and they could really do a lot. Sadly the texts didn't cite much, if anything, fell flat on their faces in terms of readability, and really provided the comic book enthusiast with absolutely nothing to work with. Being a comic book enthusiast and having a sociology degree myself, I learned nothing and felt that no one would have, regardless of their background - these essays simply missed the point of the exercise.
The second part, The Existential World of the Superhero, explore religion and Daredevil, Power, Myths and X-Women, Oracle and morals, Batman and social networks, the Fantastic Four and family, and wisdom. This section proved yet again to have such potential, and no execution. With my own personal bias lying with Oracle / Barbara Gordon and the X-Women, I was very excited for these essays. Yet again I find that nothing is offered here - and even worse they are boring and not even worth getting through. The X-Women essay centers only on the characters from the first two films, a true injustice to such intriguing characters as Storm, Phoenix, and Mystique (though there are far better choices here as well). The Oracle article proves to be one of the better, as it actually explores some dialogue and storylines from the breadth available on the character - yet again contributes nothing to her world or the analysis of it.
The third section, Superheroes and Moral Duty, analyzes (or hopes to) the idea of goodness, the choice to do good, responsibility, morals, and theology. Here the essays take on a more abstract and theoretical series of subjects which proves to be an up-turn in the essay content, but again is freed from any serious insight or analysis.
The final section, Identity and Superhero Metaphysics, features the final three chapters on identity and the Hulk, time travel during DC Crisis, and masks and secret identities. Yet again, the most useful part of these essays is the short length, allowing for a quick (and sadly worthless) read.
Overall the book is an intriguing endeavor, one that warrants credit for simply coming to fruition. As a comic fan and social analyst, I find it shocking that such useless and poorly produced essays were chosen. It almost seems the project may have been rushed in the end and prevented the real meat from being included. The essays occasionally make you go "Hmmm" with intrigue, but sadly I find that Archie comics make me go "Hmmm" the same amount of times as these essays. This does provide some quick and "interesting for the sake of the topics" reading for a comic book fan. Sadly no one but a comic book fan could even read it, as it provides little citation and reference to actual storylines. Definitely a project worth revisiting, definitely not a book worth reading.
Rewiew for Guido Alexander
Edited by Tom Morris and Matt Morris
2005
Non-fiction Book
Open Court
Part of the "Popular Culture and Philosophy" series of books (other titles include Buffy, Seinfeld, Simpsons, Lord of the Rings, and so on), this book should be either informative on super hero / comic book culture or even academically charged to provide new intellectual insight into these characters and universes. Sadly the book does neither.
Instead this anthology of essays provides poorly written (for the most part), terribly thought out (on all counts), contrived and useless essays by supposedly well educated people. I reviewed and revised that sentence numerous times and truly could not come up with a less offensive way to say it. This book should have been sharp, interesting, fun, and educational. Enough about what it should have been, let's review what it is.
The book is an attempt to relate super heroes and their worlds to philosophical theories in a very sociological manner. The book is broken into four parts: The Image of the Superhero, The Existential World of the Superhero, Superheroes and Moral Duty, and Identity and Superhero Metaphysics. Each section has between 3 and 6 essays on different characters across the major publishers (and only the major two, Marvel and DC) and how they relate to some larger philosophical issue. The authors are primarily PhD recipients or candidates in academia, though there are a handful of comic book writers and such included as well (and these tend to be the best).
The first section, the Image of the Superhero, reviews Superman and his very human social qualities, the idea of a superhero, memes and the Crimson Viper, and superhero revisionism. From the start, three of these four essays sounded like "woah" and they could really do a lot. Sadly the texts didn't cite much, if anything, fell flat on their faces in terms of readability, and really provided the comic book enthusiast with absolutely nothing to work with. Being a comic book enthusiast and having a sociology degree myself, I learned nothing and felt that no one would have, regardless of their background - these essays simply missed the point of the exercise.
The second part, The Existential World of the Superhero, explore religion and Daredevil, Power, Myths and X-Women, Oracle and morals, Batman and social networks, the Fantastic Four and family, and wisdom. This section proved yet again to have such potential, and no execution. With my own personal bias lying with Oracle / Barbara Gordon and the X-Women, I was very excited for these essays. Yet again I find that nothing is offered here - and even worse they are boring and not even worth getting through. The X-Women essay centers only on the characters from the first two films, a true injustice to such intriguing characters as Storm, Phoenix, and Mystique (though there are far better choices here as well). The Oracle article proves to be one of the better, as it actually explores some dialogue and storylines from the breadth available on the character - yet again contributes nothing to her world or the analysis of it.
The third section, Superheroes and Moral Duty, analyzes (or hopes to) the idea of goodness, the choice to do good, responsibility, morals, and theology. Here the essays take on a more abstract and theoretical series of subjects which proves to be an up-turn in the essay content, but again is freed from any serious insight or analysis.
The final section, Identity and Superhero Metaphysics, features the final three chapters on identity and the Hulk, time travel during DC Crisis, and masks and secret identities. Yet again, the most useful part of these essays is the short length, allowing for a quick (and sadly worthless) read.
Overall the book is an intriguing endeavor, one that warrants credit for simply coming to fruition. As a comic fan and social analyst, I find it shocking that such useless and poorly produced essays were chosen. It almost seems the project may have been rushed in the end and prevented the real meat from being included. The essays occasionally make you go "Hmmm" with intrigue, but sadly I find that Archie comics make me go "Hmmm" the same amount of times as these essays. This does provide some quick and "interesting for the sake of the topics" reading for a comic book fan. Sadly no one but a comic book fan could even read it, as it provides little citation and reference to actual storylines. Definitely a project worth revisiting, definitely not a book worth reading.
Rewiew for Guido Alexander
Free online manga comic book
Look up Japanese manga titles in ENGLISH. New free online comics. Comic book resourses.
Manga (漫画, Manga?) listen (help·info) (pl. manga) is the Japanese word for comics and print cartoons. The drawers of these comics are called mangaka. Outside of Japan, it refers specifically to comics originally published in Japan, or works derivative of the style. Native Japanese are often unaware of the use of manga to refer to Japanese comics specifically. As of 2007, manga represents a multi-billion dollar global market.[1] Manga developed from a mixture of ukiyo-e and foreign styles of drawing, and took its current form shortly after World War II. Recently, Manga are read by almost all Japanese social classes and age groups. Themes include sports, romance, historical drama, comedy, soap operas, fantasy, mystery, sexuality and horror. Manhua (Traditional Chinese: 漫畫; Simplified Chinese: 漫画; Pinyin: Mànhuà) are Chinese comics originally produced in China. Due to their greater degree of artistic freedom of expression and their higher standard of living, Hong Kong and Taiwan have been the places of publication of most manhua thus far, often including Chinese translations of Korean manhwa and Japanese manga.Manhwa (Hangul: 만화, Hanja: 漫畫) is the general Korean term for comics and cartoons (including animated cartoons). Outside of Korea, the term usually refers specifically to South Korean comics.
Prints & Photographs comic book collection Online Catalog
- [Drawings and artwork by Jules Feiffer, including childhood drawings, comic books drawings, offprints, and The Spirit comic books]
[between 1946 and 1975] | still image - [Captain America]
Simon, Joe, artist. | [ca. 1978] | still image. Illustration shows comic book character Captain America flying from a window holding his shield. - Peanuts. You give me that comic magazine
Schulz, Charles M., artist. | 1952 Oct. 9 [publication date] | still image - Iron Vic. Vic has been transferred as sergeant to a big marine recruit depot on the west coast
Dibble, Bernard, artist. | [between 1940 and 1947] | still image - Charles Schulz
Jones, Douglas, 1916-1987, photographer. | 1968 June 6 (date added to Look's library) | still image
Comic Art Collection: Michigan University Libraries
Over 150,000 comic books published in the United States since 1935 are included in this collection, which is the largest cataloged library collection of comic books. Index of the Michigan State University Libraries Comic Art Collection.
Animation, Caricature, and Gag and Political Cartoons
Animation, Caricature, and Gag and Political Cartoons in the United States and Canada: An International Bibliography by John A. Lent. 420 pgs. Read the complete book a questia.com member.
Review
“Lent is a prolific writer of books and articles on mass communication and a leading proponent of comic art scholarship. With these three compilations, he offers an enormous contribution to that scholarship. These works reflect long years of independent, painstaking compilation. What Lent has given us, is marvelous, and as comic art continues to be recognized and analyzed by various disciplines, these volumes should prove indispensable. All these titles are highly recommended for all academic collections.”–Choice
“...an invaluable research tool that will save countless hours in the library....Lent is to be commended for his efforts. Scholars working in any discipline related to comic arts should encourage their institutions to add his bibliographies to the library reference collection. Those who have chosen comic arts as their primary field of research should seriously consider purchasing these bibliographies for their own research collection.”–Studies in American Humor
“Contains a tremendous amount of information and are of immense value to serious comics scholars. ...a necessary purchase for collections specializing in popular culture, comics, and mass media.”– ARBA95
“If a good laugh is necessary to enable us to withstand life, as Abraham Lincoln discovered, then John Lent provides many buffers to life's bumps. In this fourth volume dealing with comic art, Lent provides a comprehensive bibliography of all kinds of art throughout the U.S. and Canada....A necessary book on the shelves of all people and libraries interested in the history of voluminous literature of humor.”–Journal of Popular Culture
Comic Art Of The United States Through 2000, Animation And Cartoons: An International Bibliography
Part of a ten-volume bibliography series on comic art compiled by John A. Lent during the past decade, this volume provides more information on U.S. and Canadian comic art, animation, caricature, and gag, political, illustrative, and magazine cartoons than any other printed source in the world. Lent, founding editor of International Journal of Comic Art and longtime scholar of cartooning globally, takes great pains to be exhaustive, representative, and accurate in providing 11,367 citations of books, chapters, articles, and "fugitive" materials gleaned from a variety of sources worldwide, including about 400 periodicals and journals. Easy to use, incorporating a well-structured outline that includes categories and sub-categories, Lent spans every conceivable aspect of comic art. Other features include periodical directories for both Canada and the United States with addresses, typical contents, and inaugural dates of 101 comic art-related journals, magazines, and fanzines, and citations to hundreds of cartoonists and animators and their characters and works. Undoubtedly, this volume and the other nine in the Greenwood/Praeger series are unequalled as the definitive comic art bibliographies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)